Plan and report evidence syntheses with rigor
We guide protocols, search strategies, screening workflows, and synthesis to meet PRISMA expectations.
Who this service is for
- Postgraduate students planning evidence syntheses
- Clinicians comparing interventions or diagnostics
- Researchers submitting PROSPERO or journal protocols
- Teams coordinating multi-reviewer screening
What we assist with
- Protocol development and registration guidance
- Database search strategies and grey literature planning
- Screening workflows and inter-rater reliability approaches
- Data extraction forms and risk-of-bias assessments
- Qualitative synthesis or meta-analysis plans with reporting templates
How the process works
Initial consultation
Clarify review question, inclusion criteria, and timelines.
Scope alignment
Design search strings, databases, and screening roles.
Expert input & feedback
Iterate protocols, pilot screening, and data extraction tools.
Final review & next-step guidance
Deliver PRISMA-aligned reporting templates and synthesis outline.
Quality, ethics & confidentiality
We promote transparent search documentation, dual screening, and bias assessment. All reference libraries and data stay under your control.
Frequently asked questions
We design and peer-review strategies; you or your librarian execute searches to keep access compliant.
We guide model choices, effect calculations, and heterogeneity checks; execution is collaborative.
We work with Covidence, Rayyan, or spreadsheet workflows depending on access.
We assist with deduplication steps and document the process.
We can discuss contribution levels; authorship remains transparent and ethical.