Interpret similarity responsibly
We help you read similarity reports, separate legitimate overlap from risk, and revise ethically.
Who this service is for
- Students reviewing Turnitin or iThenticate reports
- Researchers revising manuscripts for resubmission
- Supervisors guiding candidates on originality
- Clinicians preparing conference abstracts
What we assist with
- Interpretation of similarity percentages and match types
- Identifying legitimate citations vs. problematic overlap
- Strategies for paraphrasing without altering meaning
- Reference checks and quotation marking
- Action plans and before/after examples for revisions
How the process works
Initial consultation
Review the report, thresholds, and institutional policies.
Scope alignment
Prioritise sections and define acceptable overlap parameters.
Expert input & feedback
Annotate matches, suggest paraphrasing, and refine citations.
Final review & next-step guidance
Provide a revision checklist and tips for future drafting.
Quality, ethics & confidentiality
We uphold originality, discourage over-reliance on paraphrasing tools, and keep your documents secure. We never claim to “clear” reports or guarantee scores.
Frequently asked questions
We cannot guarantee a number; we focus on ethical improvement.
We suggest changes and examples; you implement revisions to retain authorship.
We review the report plus your document to understand context.
We model paraphrasing and cite appropriately; we do not rewrite entire sections.
Most reviews complete within 2–3 business days depending on length.