TANITY Global Med CommsTranslate narratives into credible insights
We guide coding frameworks, thematic analysis, and credibility checks for qualitative studies.
Who this service is for
- Researchers conducting interviews, focus groups, or field notes
- Clinicians capturing patient narratives for service improvement
- Students refining qualitative methodology chapters
- Teams integrating qualitative findings into mixed-methods designs
What we assist with
- Codebook development and inter-coder alignment
- Thematic, content, or framework analysis guidance
- Credibility checks: member checking, triangulation, audit trails
- Reflexivity statements and positionality reflections
- Clear reporting aligned to SRQR and COREQ expectations
How the process works
Initial consultation
Review research questions, participants, and data collection approach.
Scope alignment
Choose analysis frameworks and agree on coding strategies.
Expert input & feedback
Iterate codebooks, exemplar quotes, and thematic maps.
Final review & next-step guidance
Deliver reporting outlines and credibility checklists for defense.
Quality, ethics & confidentiality
We protect participant anonymity, encourage reflexivity, and avoid overstating thematic claims beyond the data.
Frequently asked questions
We guide and review coding; primary coding remains with you or your team.
We support common tools (NVivo, ATLAS.ti, Excel) and focus on transparent processes.
We plan translation checks and preserve meaning through dual coding when possible.
Yes, we help select illustrative, de-identified quotations.
We assist with integration frameworks for mixed-methods discussions.