TANITY Global Med CommsStrengthen your manuscript for resubmission
We help you address reviewer comments, polish language, and sharpen arguments while respecting journal guidelines.
Who this service is for
- Authors responding to peer-review feedback
- Teams refining revised submissions
- Researchers adapting to journal tone and format
- Clinicians clarifying practice implications
What we assist with
- Response-to-reviewer letters and change logs
- Reframing arguments and strengthening discussion
- Language editing and consistency checks
- Figure and table refinements based on feedback
- Highlighting limitations and future work transparently
How the process works
Initial consultation
Review reviewer letters, timelines, and journal requirements.
Scope alignment
Prioritise major and minor revisions with owners and deadlines.
Expert input & feedback
Draft responses, annotate manuscript changes, and refine language.
Final review & next-step guidance
Deliver clean and tracked versions plus a response matrix.
Quality, ethics & confidentiality
We respect peer-review boundaries, avoid overclaiming results, and keep reviewer correspondence confidential.
Frequently asked questions
No. We strengthen clarity and responsiveness without guaranteeing outcomes.
We co-draft responses and highlight evidence; you approve final wording.
We advise on analytic clarifications; substantive re-analysis is scoped separately.
We provide tracked edits and a change log for transparency.
We can coordinate feedback summaries and align contributions.